Russia has accused Ukraine of attempting to attack a state residence used by President Vladimir Putin in the northwestern Novgorod region, a claim that, if confirmed, would mark a significant escalation in the conflict between the two countries.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Ukrainian forces launched a large-scale drone attack on the presidential residence overnight between December 28 and 29. According to Lavrov, Russian air defenses intercepted a total of 91 long-range drones aimed at the site. He did not provide evidence to support the claim, and it remains unclear whether President Putin was present at the residence at the time of the alleged attack.

There was no immediate response from Ukrainian officials to the accusation. Kyiv has neither confirmed nor denied involvement, maintaining its usual policy of limited public comment on specific military operations.

Lavrov warned that the alleged attack would have consequences for Moscow’s stance in any future negotiations, signaling a tougher Russian position. He also threatened retaliation, though he did not specify what form such a response might take.

In additional remarks published on Sunday by the state-run TASS news agency, Lavrov reiterated Russia’s opposition to deeper Western involvement in the war. He warned that any European military contingents deployed to Ukraine would be considered legitimate targets by Russian armed forces, underscoring Moscow’s red lines regarding foreign troop presence.

Russian regional authorities in Novgorod said air defense systems had been active overnight, and preliminary reports indicated no major damage or casualties. Security measures around strategic sites were reportedly tightened following the incident, while investigations into the drone launches were said to be ongoing.

The claims come amid intensified fighting and an increase in long-range strikes and drone warfare on both sides, as the nearly three-year conflict shows no sign of de-escalation. International observers have cautioned that attacks on symbolic or high-profile targets could further inflame tensions and complicate already fragile diplomatic prospects. (ILKHA)